top of page

EF Gap Year Environmental Impact: What I Learned About Conservation Across Australia, Thailand & Japan

  • Writer: WattSherpa
    WattSherpa
  • Dec 28, 2025
  • 2 min read

Updated: 16 hours ago

The Sydney Opera House with the Sydney Bridge in the background.

I went on EF Gap Year’s Voyager program through Australia, Thailand, and Japan, and I paid attention to one thing the entire time: the environmental story underneath the itinerary—reef health, conservation work, sustainable living, and the ethics of wildlife tourism.

These are my WattSherpa field notes: what we did, what it taught me, and what I’m bringing into how I think about climate, ecosystems, and sustainable travel.



Why this trip matters for sustainability (not just “cool nature”)


It’s easy to treat “the environment” like a vibe. But once you’re in the water over a reef, walking through mangroves, or learning what ethical wildlife tourism actually means, sustainability becomes concrete:

  • Ecosystems are infrastructure (coastal protection, fisheries, clean water, carbon storage)

  • Tourism choices can protect or exploit (especially with wildlife)

  • “Sustainable living” is systems thinking (food, land, design, transport)


Australia: Reef science + rainforest conservation (Great Barrier Reef & Daintree)


A sea turtle swimming in crystal clear blue waters at the Great Barrier Reef off the coast of Australia

1) Great Barrier Reef: learning from a marine biologist

Snorkeling the Great Barrier Reef with scientific context flips the experience from “pretty fish” to “living indicators”:

  • coral structure and stress signals

  • biodiversity as a sign of resilience

  • how warming + pollution compound over time

WattSherpa takeaway: reefs aren’t just tourism icons—they’re biodiversity hubs and coastal defenders.


2) Daintree + Mossman Gorge: conservation + Indigenous stewardship

Seeing rainforest conservation alongside Indigenous communities is a reminder that sustainability isn’t only technology—it’s also knowledge systems, stewardship, and long time horizons.

Thailand: hands-on conservation (mangroves, reefs, dugongs) + ethical elephants


Two large elephants with two caretakers at an elephant preserve

Thailand is where the program felt most “environmental” in the doing-not-just-reading sense.


1) Sustainable living and permaculture workshop

Permaculture was one of the clearest frameworks I’ve seen for sustainability: design your inputs/outputs so the system can keep going.

What stuck with me:

  • build soil health instead of burning it out

  • work with local ecology instead of fighting it

  • think in cycles, not one-off fixes


2) Coral reef restoration + coastal ecosystem protection

In Krabi, the conservation work connects in a way that’s super WattSherpa-coded:

  • Coral reefs support biodiversity and protect coastlines

  • Mangroves stabilize shorelines and store large amounts of carbon

  • Dugongs are tied to seagrass health (an ecosystem “signal”)

WattSherpa takeaway: coastal ecosystems are climate adaptation + mitigation at once.


3) Ethical elephant tourism (Following Giants)

Elephants are where sustainability and ethics collide. This trip made it simple: you can’t call a trip “eco” if it supports exploitative wildlife tourism.

A quick ethical checklist I now use:

  • no riding, no performance shows

  • prioritize habitat + welfare over “close interactions”

  • look for transparency on care standards and partnerships


Japan: sustainability can be quiet (and built into daily life)


Japan wasn’t framed as “conservation volunteering” the same way Thailand was—but it reinforced something important: infrastructure shapes behavior.


When cities are walkable and transit is reliable, “sustainable choices” stop feeling like effort. They become default.


WattSherpa takeaway: urban design is climate policy you live inside.



Comments


bottom of page